See how papers cite each other — supporting, contrasting, or mentioning claims.
Scite goes beyond traditional citation counting to classify how papers cite each other — whether a citation is supporting, contrasting, or merely mentioning a claim. This provides a qualitative understanding of the scientific evidence strength that citation counts alone cannot give.
Scite is a citation intelligence platform that has indexed over 1.2 billion citation statements from 180M+ papers and classified each one as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning the cited claim. This is profoundly more useful than traditional citation counts — a paper with 200 citations might have 50 contrasting citations undermining its core claim. Scite surfaces this nuance. The Smart Citations feature shows the exact context of how each paper was cited by others. The Research Assistant uses this intelligence to answer research questions with citations weighted by supporting vs. contrasting evidence. Used extensively in academic research, pharmaceutical research, and by scientists evaluating the robustness of specific claims or methodologies.
Look up a foundational paper in your field and see its support/contrast ratio — how many subsequent papers have supported vs. contradicted its central claims. This reveals whether a claim is solidly established or under significant challenge, invisible from citation counts alone.
For any drug or intervention, track how the evidence base has evolved over time — how many studies support efficacy vs. raise safety concerns, and whether contradicting findings are growing. Essential for drug development, regulatory submission, and clinical trial design.
Before defending a thesis, use Scite to stress-test every major claim you cite — ensuring that the papers you rely on haven't been substantially contradicted or retracted since you cited them.
Traditional citation counts tell you how many papers have cited a work — but not why. A paper with 1000 citations could have 300 that directly contradict its core claim. Scite classifies each citation as Supporting, Contrasting, or Mentioning, giving you the qualitative picture: does the scientific community view this work as validated, disputed, or merely referenced? This is dramatically more informative for assessing research robustness.
Scite's value proposition is unique — no free tool provides classified citation intelligence. For academic researchers whose work depends on correctly evaluating evidence robustness, $20/mo is excellent value compared to the time cost of manually assessing how a claim has fared in the literature. For casual or early-stage research, Elicit or Consensus may be better starting points. Scite is for researchers who need to go deep on evidence quality for specific claims.
Scite's coverage is strongest in biomedical, natural, and physical sciences — reflecting the structure of academic publishing where journals are well-indexed and citation patterns are dense. Coverage in humanities, social sciences, and regional or non-English publications is less complete. Check whether your specific journals and fields are covered before subscribing.
The gold standard for AI research — 50-100 sources, one cited report.
View Review & Details →Google's deep research — free tier available, powered by Gemini 2.5 Pro.
View Review & Details →Fast, cited deep research — free tier available with 5 queries per day.
View Review & Details →